• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number WCD 4000
Device Problems Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 12/29/2013
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
During a retroactive review of past complaints for potential adverse events, conducted as a capa in response to a recent fda inspection, a reportable adverse event was discovered.On (b)(6) 2012, zoll was notified that a (b)(6) male pt received a treatment following a lengthy period of vt.Zoll contacted the hospital where the pt was admitted.The pt's nurse reported that the pt had been intubated following the lifevest defibrillation.The pt's nurse reported that she thought that the lifevest took too long to administer a treatment, "as over 30 seconds of v-tach were recorded by their telemetry before the treatment took place." another of the pt's nurses reported that the lifevest "appeared to be doing nothing when the pt needed treatment, so she pressed the button on the device to shock him." zoll was notified that the pt received an additional treatment the same day.A third nurse indicated that she "pressed the button on the monitor to administer a treatment." the pt later passed away.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device eval summary: device evaluations of monitor sn (b)(4) and belt sn (b)(4) were completed.Upon eval, the monitor and electrode belt were fully functional.Review of the event reveals that the pt experienced one inappropriate and one appropriate shock during an episode of vt.The first arrhythmia self-converted to sinus bradycardia just prior the treatment.The second arrhythmia was successfully converted to a slower rhythm.Despite the report from the nurses that the "button was pressed to deliver treatment", review of the event reveals that the response buttons were not pressed during the entire event.As the nurses reported, it is likely that only 1 response button was pressed.Pressing only 1 response button does not interrupt or affect the treatment sequence.Zoll explained to the nurses that pressing both response buttons delays a treatment from occurring.Zoll further explained that the lifevest may siren for 60 seconds before treating for vt and that there is no button on the device to force the lifevest to administer a treatment.There is no indication that the lifevest caused or contributed to the pt being intubated.Device mfg date: monitor; belt: 04/2012.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
pittsburgh PA 15238 349
Manufacturer Contact
katelynn mains
121 gamma dr
pittsburgh, PA 15238-3495
4129683333
MDR Report Key4250072
MDR Text Key5016004
Report Number3008642652-2014-03675
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/06/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberWCD 4000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/14/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/31/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Other;
Patient Age74 YR
-
-