During a retroactive review of past complaints for potential adverse events, conducted as a capa in response to a recent fda inspection, a reportable adverse event was discovered.On (b)(6) 2012, zoll was notified that a (b)(6) male pt received a treatment following a lengthy period of vt.Zoll contacted the hospital where the pt was admitted.The pt's nurse reported that the pt had been intubated following the lifevest defibrillation.The pt's nurse reported that she thought that the lifevest took too long to administer a treatment, "as over 30 seconds of v-tach were recorded by their telemetry before the treatment took place." another of the pt's nurses reported that the lifevest "appeared to be doing nothing when the pt needed treatment, so she pressed the button on the device to shock him." zoll was notified that the pt received an additional treatment the same day.A third nurse indicated that she "pressed the button on the monitor to administer a treatment." the pt later passed away.
|
Device eval summary: device evaluations of monitor sn (b)(4) and belt sn (b)(4) were completed.Upon eval, the monitor and electrode belt were fully functional.Review of the event reveals that the pt experienced one inappropriate and one appropriate shock during an episode of vt.The first arrhythmia self-converted to sinus bradycardia just prior the treatment.The second arrhythmia was successfully converted to a slower rhythm.Despite the report from the nurses that the "button was pressed to deliver treatment", review of the event reveals that the response buttons were not pressed during the entire event.As the nurses reported, it is likely that only 1 response button was pressed.Pressing only 1 response button does not interrupt or affect the treatment sequence.Zoll explained to the nurses that pressing both response buttons delays a treatment from occurring.Zoll further explained that the lifevest may siren for 60 seconds before treating for vt and that there is no button on the device to force the lifevest to administer a treatment.There is no indication that the lifevest caused or contributed to the pt being intubated.Device mfg date: monitor; belt: 04/2012.
|