• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION SURGUARD3 SAFETY HYPODERMIC NEEDLE; TERUMO NEOLUS NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION SURGUARD3 SAFETY HYPODERMIC NEEDLE; TERUMO NEOLUS NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SG3-03L2525
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved device was not returned for evaluation, which limits the failure investigation to assessment of user facility information and evaluation of reserve samples from the reported lot and current lot samples.No abnormalities or defects were noted on visual inspection and all samples passed functional testing.Simulation testing was performed; retention samples were manually activated as per instructions for use (ifu), by finder activation, thumb activation, and surface activation.Audible sound (click) was heard and the needle was completely engaged under the tooth upon visual confirmation.Successful activation was achieved without breaking the safety sheath and no difficulty were experienced.A review of the device history records and inspection records indicated that there were no production related problems.Although the cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based upon the available information, there is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The device labeling does address the potential for such an occurrence in the warnings/cautions and the instructions-for-use with statements such as the following: (1) after the injection procedure, use a one-handed technique to activate the safety mechanism using any of the three methods; finger activation, thumb activation, or surface activation.Activation is verified by an audible and/or tactile "click", and visually confirm that the safety sheath is fully engaged.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.(b)(4).Device not returned.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that the sg3 safety guard is difficult to engage.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow-up #1 for mfg.Report # 3003902955-2014-00023 to provide the results of the evaluation of the ten unopened samples returned to the manufacturing facility.Ten unopened samples from the initially reported lot#/product code combination were returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.Visual inspection confirmed the following: 1) the collar, safety sheath and the sheath tooth of actual and retention samples were free from molding related defects: (2) the safety sheath was properly attached on the assemble needle and the collar was fully seated on the hub; (3) the safety sheath was properly attached on the assembled needle and the color was fully seated on the hub, which indicates the sheath was in normal alignment.Function testing confirmed that performance specifications were met.Simulation testing was conducted.Actual samples were manually activated as per instructions for use (ifu), by (c) finger activation, (d) thumb activation and (e) surface activation.Audible sound (click) was heard and the needle was completely engaged under the tooth upon visual inspection.The needle was completely engaged under the tooth.Successful activation was achieved without breaking the safety sheath and no difficulty was experienced.A review of the device history inspection records indicated that there were no production related problems.Although the cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based upon the available information, there is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The device labeling does address the potential for such an occurrence in the warnings/cautions and the instructions-for-use with statements such as the following: (1) "position sheath approximately 45 degrees to a flat surface.Press down with a firm, quick motion until a distinct audible click is heard"; and (2) "visually confirm that the needle is fully engaged under the lock".All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
This report is being submitted as follow-up #1 for mfg.Report # 3003902955-2014-00023 to provide the results of the evaluation of the ten unopened samples returned to the manufacturing facility.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURGUARD3 SAFETY HYPODERMIC NEEDLE
Type of Device
TERUMO NEOLUS NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION
124 east main avenue
laguna technopark
binan, laguna
RP 
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION
124 east main avenue
laguna technopark
binan, laguna
RP  
Manufacturer Contact
cathleen hargreaves
950 elkton blvd.
elkton, MD 21921
8002837866
MDR Report Key4251612
MDR Text Key19373430
Report Number3003902955-2014-00023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122249
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2014,11/14/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberSG3-03L2525
Device Lot Number130824A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/27/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Device Age14 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer10/20/2014
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2014
Initial Date FDA Received11/14/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/22/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-