• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZIV6-35-125-6.0-40-PTX
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Reocclusion (1985)
Event Date 02/18/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2012, the complaint product was placed in the lower part of the right sfa, (b)(6) 2014 restenosis (50-99%) in the lesion where the complaint stent was implanted was confirmed.Ulcer and worsened claudication was observed to the pt.Removal of the blood clots and stent placement (misago/ terumo) were performed against this.The condition of the pt recovered.No further adverse effects to the pt have been reported as occurring.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Incident meets criteria of an fda mdr report based on the intervention carried out (removal of the blood clots and stent placement) as a result of restenosis occurring while a zilver ptx stent was indwelling.The zilver ptx device involved in this complaint was implanted in the pt therefore, is not available for eval.With the info provided, a document based investigation was carried out.Add'l comment received from the physician is as follows: "although some blood clots were seen in the stenosed part, since intimal thickening was also observed there, we diagnosed that it was not in-stent thrombosis." it may be noted that re-stenosis is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures and can be reached by injury to the vessel (e.G.During pta and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response tha t leads (or amplifies) ot the restenosis process.As per instructions for use: worsened claudication and restenosis of the stented artery are noted as a potential adverse event associated with the placement of this device.Although requested images were not available to support the complaint investigation.A review of the mfg records for ziv6-35-125-6.0-40- ptx device and functional checks to ensure device integrity.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.Since there are no images available for review, there is no evidence to suggest that re-stenosis did not occur; therefore the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
sinead quaid, sr, specialist
EI  
61334440
MDR Report Key4254391
MDR Text Key5110183
Report Number3001845648-2014-00226
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P100022/S001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/15/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/12/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/10/2014
Device Catalogue NumberZIV6-35-125-6.0-40-PTX
Device Lot NumberC772689
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/18/2014
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received10/16/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/30/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
-
-