• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Malposition of Device (2616); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient stated her leads were never hooked up.The patient never had therapeutic effect.The patient had tried to start charging in (b)(6) 2014, but she was never able to do so.An overdischarge (od) was suspected.The patient had changed physicians and may have a revision.Additional follow up from the company representative stated that at the time of implant, he was aware that only one lead was implanted when the original plan was 2.They physician had difficulty placing the lead due to the patient having ¿too much tissue between the skin and spinal cord.¿ the patient was unhappy and lost confidence in the physician.The patient was not happy with the therapy.The company representative had checked the devices and said they were fine, but due to non-optimal placement of the lead (and absence of the second lead) the patient was just not getting optimal relief.The implanting physician had offered a revision but the patient declined.The patient initially stated that she would leave the device off as she had trips planned.Additional information indicated that the patient had the device replaced as the lead had migrated.The patient had stimulation in her ribs/lungs.The implant had been done by another surgeon, and the current surgeon wanted to replace the whole system.The patient was scheduled to return for follow up on (b)(6) 2014 but it was stated that both the leads and the battery were replaced successfully with good therapeutic coverage post operatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products: product id 977a260, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, explanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead; product id 97740, serial # (b)(4), product type programmer, patient; product id 97754, serial # (b)(4), product type recharger; product id 977a260, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4262625
MDR Text Key5047460
Report Number3004209178-2014-21887
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/06/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/19/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/28/2014
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2014
Date Device Manufactured02/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00062 YR
-
-