• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U225
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Occlusion Within Device (1423); Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problems Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Fatigue (1849); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Thrombus (2101)
Event Date 10/27/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately 55 weeks after implant, this bioprosthetic valve was explanted due to severe aortic stenosis and high gradients.At explant, it was observed that there was thrombus or debris in the bellies of the valve.It also was reported that the implant of the valve was via minimal invasive approach through a right thoracotomy.Following implant, a mild-to-moderate paravalvular leak was noted.The patient was placed back onto bypass, and additional sutures were placed to resolve the paravalvular leak.The patient exhibited exertional dyspnea, fatigue and chest pain, which may have been related to the placement of the additional sutures.It also was reported that the patient, who has factor v leiden deficiency, exhibited venous bleeding during the operation, which was resolved during the implant procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the device will be returned for analysis.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis/investigation is completed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.It was reported that the device return for analysis is pending.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, the device was in a clear 0.2% glutaraldehyde solution in an explant kit.Visual inspection revealed the valve to be distorted; oval shaped.Part of the sewing ring was removed during explant.Small needle holes along the existing sewing ring show placement of implantation sutures.Pledgets remained attached to the existing sewing ring and remnant of host tissue received with the valve.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible, except where host tissue extended on the outflow.Tears observed on the tunica of all cusps along the inflow margin of attachment were determined to be associated with the removal of host tissue during explant.The free margin of all cusps were received folded back towards the belly of the cusps.The free margin of the non-coronary cusp was received folded back and adhered to the host tissue on the outflow.All commissures were intact.A remnant of pannus remained attached to the sewing ring on the inflow, adjacent to the left cusp.A remnant of pannus was received with the valve.Traces of pannus remained attached to the existing sewing ring, outflow rails and stent posts.It was determined that an unknown amount of pannus was been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Tan thrombotic appearing host tissue filled and stiffened the right and non-coronary cusps on the outflow, with remnants on the outflow of the left cusp.Radiography showed no evidence of mineralization in the valve and/or host tissue.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The distortion found on the returned device is consistent with a sizing issue and/or squeezing of the stent during implant.Based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the severe aortic stenosis and high gradient could have resulted in the abundant thrombus filling the cusp outflow that caused an immobile leaflet issue.In addition, valve distortion could also cause the leaflets to become immobile, and lead to stenosis / high gradient.Exactly when and how the distortion occurred cannot be determined; however each device is inspected for distortion and this valve passed the inspection prior to release for distribution.Medtronic will continue to monitor field performance for similar events should they occur.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4270833
MDR Text Key5031796
Report Number2025587-2014-00919
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/29/2018
Device Model Number305U225
Device Catalogue Number305U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/17/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/17/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/21/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
02/17/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/12/2014
02/26/2015
09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00069 YR
Patient Weight87
-
-