It was reported that patients who underwent a lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with at least 6 months post-op radiographs, were divided based on whether they received an osteoconductive (oc) or osteoinductive (oi) bone graft substitute.A total of 126 patients (78 oi, 48 oc) met the inclusion criteria for the assessment for fusion.The oc groups included allografts, calcium phosphate, ceramics and hydroxyapatite products.The oi group included bone morphogenic protein, demineralized bone matrix, and stem cell-based products.Using a conservative hierarchical approach to determine fusion, fusion criteria included stringent use of multiple measurement methods including flexion/extension x-rays, lenke and brantigan ct fusion measurement criteria, and history of revision surgery due to pseudoarthrosis.Ten patients in the oi group had non-fusions.
|
Literature article citation : kurd et al.¿fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes¿.Eur spine j.2014 nov 5.(b)(4): neither the device nor applicable imaging study films or patient medical records were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.Products from multiple manufacturers were implanted/used during the procedure.Although it is unknown if any of the devices contributed to the reported event, we are filing this mdr for notification purposes.
|