DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE LEOPARD IMPLANT, PARALLEL, 28X; SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 186448109 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 08/26/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
International affiliate reports that at the time of impact, the leopard vertebral body replacement device broke.There is no report of any adverse consequences to the patient at this time.As such, this appears to be a reportable malfunction.If it is learned that there were adverse consequences, the supplemental medwatch report will be filed correcting this event to a serious injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A complaint investigation will be performed.The complaint product is not available for the investigation.A supplemental report is not anticipated unless the results of the complaint investigation identify a corrective action or additional relevant information.Should the product become available, a physical evaluation will be conducted and a supplemental report filed with the results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device not returned.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The 28x parallel leopard implant (product code: 1864-48-109, lot number: anbdog) was returned to the complaints handling unit (chu).Visual inspection of the implant confirms that the side of the cage opposite of the half featuring the threaded insertion hole has broken into several fragments.This is in line with the complaint description which states that the cage broke during impaction.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.No emerging trends were found requiring further actions.The root cause of the cage breaking during impaction cannot be determined from the sample and information provided.A potential root cause may be unexpectedly high forces that may have been placed upon a limited surface area during impaction, leading to the cage fracturing.Ifu-0902-90-077 rev.D states that the broad surface of the insertion tool should be carefully seated fully against the implant during impaction.Impaction forces applied directly to a small surface of the implant could cause fracture of the implant.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|