• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had stimulation in the wrong location following implant.The patient needed stimulation to be in the thighs, back, buttocks, and lower back, but stimulation kept going to the feet and calves.If stimulation was turned up to 1.70 it was so strong it hurt.If it was turned down to 1.45, 1.50, 1.60 it didn¿t help with the pain.The patient reported their feet were flying because of the stimulation.It was reported the temporary was perfect and awesome so they went ahead with the permanent; but this was nothing like the temporary.The patient had three or four adjustments and was wondering how many times it would take to get the device adjusted before it worked.The patient received assistance from their doctor and company representative on (b)(6) 2014 and their concerns were resolved.The patient¿s health care provider (hcp) reported that the patient did not have a 50% or greater symptoms reduction.It was not device related.Reprogramming was attempted for extended appointments, times three, without significant improvement.An x-ray on (b)(6) 2014 did not indicate significant movement of the lead.The patient experienced a gradual loss of therapeutic effect.The patient did not experience a loss of stimulation.The patient was scheduled for a lead revision on (b)(6) 2014.It was confirmed that the patient had a very successful trial.They were using stimulation from the proximal portion of the lead.So when they did the implant the doctor positioned the lead to approximate where the electrodes were during the trial.The patient did not receive effective stimulation from this lead placement, so the doctor did a revision to move the lead up.Now the patient has effective therapy and has recovered without problem.If additional information is received, a follow up report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 97754, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.Product id: 97740, serial# (b)(4), product type: programmer, patient.Product id: 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.Product id: 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4318185
MDR Text Key16089143
Report Number3004209178-2014-23662
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/10/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2015
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2014
Date Device Manufactured09/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00071 YR
-
-