Model Number 3186 |
Device Problems
Kinked (1339); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Impedance Problem (2950)
|
Patient Problem
Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
|
Event Date 10/27/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The patient (b)(6) received two leads.This event is related to the right-side lead.It was reported the patient experienced auto-reduction through the scs system.Diagnostics revealed multiple invalid impedance values on the affected lead.Reprogramming was unsuccessful.Subsequently, the patient underwent surgical intervention to explant and replace the affected lead.A visible kink was observed on the explanted lead.The physician electively replaced the ipg as well due to its age.Effective therapy was restored post-operatively.The implant date of the anchor (model 1192) is unknown.The model and implant date of the left-side lead is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the complaint for ¿auto-reducing/ invalid impedance¿ was confirmed.As received, microscopic inspection revealed that the lead had a kink 16.5 cm from the stimulation end where all of the internal wires were broken, and a cam impression from the swift-lock anchor.As there was no breach of the outer tubing and invalid impedance was observed prior to the revision, the fracture is consistent with an overstress condition the lead was subjected to distal end of the swift-lock while it was still implanted.The returned swift-lock anchor had no anomalies and functioned as designed.Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|