The associated devices were returned and evaluated.The visual inspection of the devices confirms that the stem is broken.The liner shows damage not uncommon when product is removed.We were unable to perform a dimensional or functional analysis due to the damage to the devices.Our lab performed an analysis of the material characteristics and the results showed the emperion stem fracture could have occurred in the lateral region of the stem.The presence of beach marks indicates that fatigue may have been the fracture mechanism.The signs of fretting observed on the lateral side of the proximal taper region of the stem indicated repeated contact between the stem and the sleeve.The signs of scratching and damage on the porous coated regions of the sleeve could have been due to removal of the components.No defects in material or design were noted during this analysis.Our investigation could not determine a specific cause of the failure.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This investigation could not verify or identify any evidence of product contribution to the reported problem.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|