• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE APC 2; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number APC 2
Device Problems Output, high (1433); Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified) (2203)
Patient Problem Internal Organ Perforation (1987)
Event Date 10/22/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that an erbe system; argon plasma coagulator (apc) model apc 2 with an electrosurgical generator model vio 300 d (part number 10140-100, serial number (b)(4)) was used in a procedure to treat arteriovenous malformations (avms).The settings were pulsed apc 2 mode at 20 watts.The account reported that upon activation the mode switched to forced apc and the output was too high.A perforation occurred.No further patient information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A thorough evaluation on the returned system was conducted.A technical safety check was performed on each unit.This included an electrical safety check, a function check of each of the equipment's features, and a power output check.Also, the gas flow rates were measured and found to be within their acceptable ranges for the apc.All features were/are functioning properly within specifications on both devices.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history records (dhrs) for the apc and esu.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or attributed to the event (note: unrelated to the reported issue and to further meet the customer needs, some unrelated software update work was performed on the system upon an initial evaluation of the units).The report of higher output was not found.All outputs were within specifications.Also, a review of the system's chronological log revealed that the system was not activated in the forced apc mode as the customer reported.Twenty activations of pulsed apc mode occurred as intended within an eight (8) minute period on the date of the reported incident.Most likely there were many factors involved in the reported event.However, it appears that upon the intervention, the remaining wall did not stay intact which resulted in the perforation.Nonetheless, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the incident.The account is being made aware of the findings.To further address the issue, additional in-service training is being offered to the involved medical staff.Erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE APC 2
Type of Device
ARGON PLASMA COAGULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
tuebingen
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhoernlestrasse 17
tuebingen 7207 2
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067
7709554400
MDR Report Key4336244
MDR Text Key5142478
Report Number9610614-2014-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K024047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/04/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPC 2
Device Catalogue Number10134-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/24/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA12/04/2014
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/22/2014
Device Age4 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer11/07/2014
Date Manufacturer Received12/04/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/06/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-