• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CPI - DEL CARIBE ACUITY; IMPLANTABLE LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CPI - DEL CARIBE ACUITY; IMPLANTABLE LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 4555
Device Problems Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Death (1802); Perforation (2001); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 11/24/2014
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
 
Event Description
Boston scientific received information that this patient was presented to the electrophysiology (ep) laboratory in (b)(6) 2014.Following the implant procedure, the patient became hemodynamically unstable and died.The cause of death, as reported by the physician, was attributed to perforation at some point during the placement of the left ventricular (lv) lead.The guiding catheter (acuity pro extended hook, 49 cm) had been inserted into the coronary sinus ostium (cs os) without difficulty.The left ventricular (lv) was inserted but was pulled back due to tracking issues.Following cs contrast injection, contrast could be visualize in the epicardium.Subsequently, the implant procedure proceeded without difficulty.An echocardiogram taken following the procedure identified blood around the heart.A pericardiocentesis was performed and 200 cc of blood was withdrawn.Despite emergency measures, the patient could not be stabilized and died.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.To date, no additional information has been received.
 
Event Description
Subsequently, boston scientific received the procedural report from the investigation site in early-february 2015.According to the report, a right ventricular (rv) defibrillation lead was implanted without difficulty.A 9.5 french sheath was advanced over the second wire into the axillary vein.An acuity pro sheath was advanced to the right atrium over a long glide wire.During the attempt to cannulate the coronary sinus, the acuity pro sheath perforated the ra wall and entered the pericardial space.This was confirmed with injection of 5 cc of contrast which was noted to fill the pericardial space.The sheath was pulled back and was advanced into the coronary sinus.The patient's blood pressure and heart rate were monitored very closely and remained stable for the duration of the procedure.Coronary sinus cannulation was confirmed with injection of another 5cc of contrast.The lv lead was then advanced over a wire into a lateral branch of the middle cardiac vein, and placed in the low inferolateral aspect of the lv.With adequate threshold, favorable ecg morphology, and no evidence of diaphragmatic stimulation (with high output), it was decided to retain the lead in this location.After the lv lead was secured and the ra lead repositioned due to dislodgement, defibrillation threshold (dft) testing was performed.The patient had stable hemodynamic status post-dft testing.Once the pocket site was dressed, the patient was given cardioversion with 200 joules.This successfully converted the patient's atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm.A limited echo was performed after which did show a moderate sized pericardial effusion, but no evidence of tamponade physiology.As previously reported, at some point following the procedure, a pericardiocentesis was performed and 200 cc of blood was withdrawn.Despite emergency measures, the patient could not be stabilized and died.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up 002 report was not submitted previously.As per request by the fda on january 31, 2024, follow-up 002 has been resubmitted in an effort to release follow-up 003 from hold status.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific received information that this patient was presented to the electrophysiology (ep) laboratory in (b)(6) 2014.Following the implant procedure, the patient became hemodynamically unstable and died.The cause of death, as reported by the physician, was attributed to perforation at some point during the placement of the left ventricular (lv) lead.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACUITY
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CPI - DEL CARIBE
guidant puerto rico b. v.
dorado PR
Manufacturer (Section G)
GUIDANT PUERTO RICO BV
guidant puerto rico b. v.
dorado PR
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot vasekar
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key4342793
MDR Text Key5140498
Report Number2124215-2014-21603
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OJX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132914
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/05/2015
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/12/2016
Device Model Number4555
Other Device ID NumberACUITY STEERABLE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/24/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/18/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
02/05/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/18/2014
02/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
0293.; 4087.; 4555.; N160.; N160; 0293; 4555; 4087
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Death;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-