It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the proximal right coronary artery (rca).Pre-dilatation was performed.The 3.0 x 48 xience xpedition stent was deployed in the proximal to mid rca and confirmed to be fully apposed.The 2.25 x 12 mm xience prime stent delivery system (sds) was then advanced and the stent was deployed distally; however, during removal of the sds, there was interaction with the deployed stents and both stents were pulled into the catheter by the sds.Two new stents were used to treat the lesions.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The device damaged by another device was able to be confirmed.The difficult to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.Based on a visual inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the electronic complaint database revealed no other similar incidents reported for difficult to remove or device damaged by another device from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling.
|