Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
Fall (1848)
|
Event Date 01/12/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that patient underwent right total shoulder arthroplasty on an unknown date.Subsequently, the patient underwent seven revisions on unknown dates for unknown reasons.Recently, the patient experienced a traumatic fall, resulting in a fractured reverse morse taper.No revision has been reported to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that patient underwent right total shoulder arthroplasty on an unknown date.Subsequently, the patient underwent seven revisions on unknown dates for unknown reasons.Recently, the patient experienced a traumatic fall, resulting in a fractured reverse morse taper that had been implanted (b)(6) 2011.Subsequently, patient underwent a revision procedure (b)(6) 2015.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product identification necessary to review history was not provided.Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.The following sections could not be completed with the limited information provided.Catalog number, lot number and expiration date - unknown.Date implanted - unknown.Initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).510k number - unknown.Manufacture date ¿ unknown.Event is being reported to fda on one medwatch as the limited information available indicates that a revision procedure is (or may be) needed.Should additional information be received regarding a revision procedure, the complaint will be reassessed and further medwatch reports will be submitted, if necessary.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information that was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch and to report device evaluation results.Product was returned for evaluation on february 16, 2015.Dimensional evaluation of the device was not performed due to the nature of the complaint and because it fractured at the taper joint.The distortion of the base and the embedded taper also make measurements meaningless as the fracture occurred due to loading issues and not dimensional ones.Based on device history records review, the product was made to print and correct materials and product left conforming to print as there was no evidence that states otherwise.The root cause is likely to be biomechanical overload leading to the possibility of an overstressed joint when the patient fell as mentioned in the complaint.Thus the conditions of use caused or contributed to this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|