• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERNO SHANDON LIMITED (TRADING AS THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC) THERMO SCIENTIFIC FINESSE ME ELECTRONIC MICROT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERNO SHANDON LIMITED (TRADING AS THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC) THERMO SCIENTIFIC FINESSE ME ELECTRONIC MICROT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 77500102
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 10/13/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2014, a hospital lab in (b)(6) reported to (b)(6) the following: a female lab technician was operating a finesse me microtome (sn (b)(4)).She thought she pressed the stop button, and placed her right hand near the blade.The machine advanced and sliced off part of her finger near the fingernail.She went to the er and the tissue that was cut-off could not be reattached.She was released from the er and went back to work, but later went home due to her finger hurting.The employee spoken to by (b)(6) was from the hospitals biomet/safety department, not the female lab technician.The hospital also reported that they tested the machine "about a 100 times" and could not replicate the issue.The hospital formalized this report to thermo fisher scientific via (b)(6) using mandatory fda 3500a reporting form (appendix 3 8415 medwatch finesse microtome).On (b)(6) 2014, the hospital confirmed the following: "starting with the first block of the day, when switching from the trim mode to the section mode, the user had hit the run button to stop the microtome.She was grabbing for a ribbon but the machine had not stopped and she cut her finger".The root cause was determined as user error.Investigations into the functioning of the instrument suggests the instrument operated as intended.The scenario reported could not be repeated.The only hypothesis for the cause of the incident the user did not depresses the "run" button the second time as thought, thus the instrument did not stop and in continuing its intended operation the user cut their finger.A review of the instrument by the hospitals biomedical engineer showed the instrument operated as intended.Currently the hospital outsources the servicing of the instrument.This outsourcing is tasked independently of thermo fisher scientific.However as a result of the reported incident a usa thermo fisher service technician visited the hospital, the purpose of this visit was to ensure there were no faults in the operation of the instrument that would cause or contribute to the cut finger.The instrument was found to be working as intended and the thermo field service engineer could not recreate the incident as described.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMO SCIENTIFIC FINESSE ME ELECTRONIC MICROT
Type of Device
FINESSE ME
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERNO SHANDON LIMITED (TRADING AS THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC)
runcorn, cheshire WA7 1TA
UK  WA7 1TA
Manufacturer (Section G)
RICHARD-ALLAN SCIENTIFIC
4481 campus dr.
kalamazoo MI 49008
Manufacturer Contact
4481 campus dr.
kalamazoo, MI 49008
MDR Report Key4360604
MDR Text Key5235005
Report Number1831638-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IDO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type Unknown
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/07/2014,11/03/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/10/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number77500102
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA11/10/2014
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/13/2014
Device Age11 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer10/15/2014
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-