(b)(4).The results of this investigation concluded resistance was felt when manipulating the remaining intact leaflet.The dislodged leaflet contained a fracture, and one of the recessed pivot areas contained a chip on the inner butterfly apex.Special stains were negative for organisms, and no acute inflammation or significant calcifications were present.The evenness of the coating and unremarkable nature of the material, ruled out any suggestion material defect.Rather, the fractured leaflet and orifice damage was caused by some external force applied to the leaflet and orifice, which overstressed the carbon material.There was no evidence found to suggest the cause of the leaflet fracture, orifice damage, and difficulty opening and closing one leaflet were due to an intrinsic defect in the valve, as supported by review of the valve's device history record and the analysis performed.The cause of the reported event remains unknown.
|
In (b)(6) 2008, an aortic and mitral valve replacement procedure was performed where a 33 mm sjm mechanical valve was implanted in the mitral position and this 25 mm sjm masters series valve was implanted in the aortic position.In (b)(6) 2014, reoperation for aortic paravalvular leak was performed in (b)(6).In (b)(6) 2014, the patient presented with chest pain and required emergent surgical intervention when fluoroscopy noted a single aortic mechanical valve leaflet.At the explant procedure, it was confirmed the presence of a single aortic mechanical valve leaflet.Further investigation determined the presence of the missing aortic valve leaflet was in the iliac artery.The valve was replaced with a mechanical valve from another manufacturer.The patient was reported to be recovering.
|