• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; BIT, DRILL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; BIT, DRILL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Sedation (2368)
Event Date 06/06/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a planned removal surgery on (b)(6) 2013, the screws were difficult to remove.The patient had undergone an internal fixation with lag screws and angular stable plate of the left lateral tibial head fracture on (b)(6) 2011.It was reported that post-operatively the patient had continued to experience localized symptoms in the area of the bend of the angular stable l-plate.The patient had wanted to get the implants removed; however, an x-ray revealed a residual gap indicating healing was not complete.Almost two years after the internal fixation, a ct scan of the left tibial head has been recorded to document the bone healing.The scan shows complete bone consolidation in the anterior sections of the tibial head and a roughly pea-sized subchondral cyst in the area of the former fracture gap.Signs of bone consolidation are also apparent in the posterior sections of the former fracture.The four proximal screws were stuck so tightly that none of the four screws could be removed with the normal allen key.All four heads just spun round.The special instrument set was then opened, and at least one of the four screws could be grabbed and then unscrewed using the special instruments for spinning screw heads.The threads on the other three screws could not be anchored sufficiently with the special instruments, and even after the screw heads were drilled with the diamond drill none of them could be removed with the special instruments.The three distal angular stable screws could be removed without problems using the allen key.By contrast, a more proximally located angular stable screw initially spun round and could not be removed even with the special instruments.Therefore, the heads of a total of four angular stable screws had to be drilled out completely from the plate using the 3.5 drill, and the l-plate loosened with the chisel and removed.Drilling was then continued over the four remaining threaded cores until these could be removed using the special instruments.A titanium cannulated cancellous bone screw with washer inserted from outside the l-plate was then located under image intensifier control.The screw head was exposed and the screw, together with washer, unscrewed and removed without difficulty.The resulting holes in the tibia and the surrounding soft tissues were then irrigated liberally, paying particular attention to the removal of as much as possible of the metal swarf formed during the drilling operations.The muscle fascia in the distal section and the proximal part of the iliotibial tract was then closed using strong absorbable sutures.The subcutaneous cavity was drained with a thin redon drain led out through a separate incision.The skin was closed with vertical mattress sutures according to (b)(6).A sterile dressing was applied.This report is for an unknown drill bit.This is report 10 of 10 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown drill bit /unknown lot.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation summary: it was a planned implant removal.The patient wished to have the implants removed after two years in-situ.According to the received documents, the patient was informed prior to the surgery (by the surgeon) about the possible difficulties in relation to spinning/ cold-welding of the screw heads and possible breakage of the osteosynthesis materials.The present complaint was sent in by the patient himself as he wanted to get some technical feedback.A review of the device history records found no issues that would have contributed to this complaint condition.No manufacturing related failure could be detected.A visual inspection confirmed several broken screw heads with drilled out screw recess.A dimensional inspection could not be performed due to the damage incurred.No indication for material or design related issue.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was scheduled to take 1.5 hours, but wound up taking almost 4 hours to complete.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
BIT, DRILL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4413201
MDR Text Key18067128
Report Number2520274-2015-10313
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/18/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/13/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/05/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/21/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
-
-