Catalog Number 03.010.410 |
Device Problem
Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/10/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(4) as follows: it was reported that the blade has remained stuck in the protective sleeve.In addition, the blade is also stuck on the screwdriver.It was reported that is not a revision surgery.The duration of the operation has been extended the time needed to change the box, estimated at 5 minutes.There was no patient harm reported.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Subject device has been received; no conclusion could be drawn as the product is entering the complaint system.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An investigation summary was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: the investigation summary for article 03.010.410 with lot number 7808156, 1 part is involved: shows that the impactor is jammed together with the blade.The manufacturing review shows that the production procedure was according to the specifications and there were no issues that would contribute to this complaint condition.Based on the received information we are not able to determine the exact cause of this complaint because no detailed information about the event is available.As we can see, the blade was not positioned in the protect sleeve as intended.Due to the hammering marks at the impactor and the sleeve, we can presume that the instrument was subjected to an excessive force application onto the incorrectly placed blade which could finally cause the jamming and the malfunction of the devices.Because of the damage, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy of the valid manufacturing specifications.We conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|