Model Number 3688 |
Device Problem
Low Battery (2584)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/08/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the patient's ((b)(6)) ipg is displaying a 'low battery' indication which was confirmed by the sjm representative.Surgical intervention will take place to address the issue.
|
|
Event Description
|
Follow-up identified the patient did not lose stimulation due to the low battery indication.Subsequently, the ipg was explanted and replaced.Effective stimulation was restored post-surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: a visual inspection of the ipg as received did not reveal any abnormalities.Communication with the device was normal when using a patient programmer and grey screen utility.During initial communication, an ipg low battery message was observed on the patient programmer.Electrical current characterization of the ipg current draw using the last known programmed settings was performed and it was determined the ucod (u2) voltage multiplier circuitry was not decrementing properly.The device was programmed to the as received settings of 60hz, 375us, 4.8ma in a continuous stimulation mode and attached to a 1k ohm lead.The ipg current draw from the battery was monitored and averaged 415ua with a vmultiplier voltage of 13.68v at tp27.A control device programmed to the same parameters averaged a current draw of 190ua with a vmultiplier voltage of 5.89v.When the vmultiplier voltage is at the maximum of 13.68v, the device was drawing excess current which resulted in the device battery depleting sooner than expected.Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation codes: results: additional device analysis was warranted to better ensure device functionality.The device was subjected to a functional test on automated test equipment (ate).This tester verifies the electrical performance of the control/communication circuitry, and output signal integrity.All portions of ate testing passed.Electrical pulse load testing confirmed the device battery voltage was low.Following up electrical testing determined the device was functioning within specification.When programming the device at 3 different settings and ensuring the correct calibration factors had been down loaded into the device, it was concluded the device was functioning within the electrical specifications.A review of the communication history noted that no programming history or lead impedances were provided.Based on the insufficient information concerning the programming and lead impedance history an accurate longevity could not be performed.The device was performing in electrical specification during testing and the root cause of the depleted battery could not be ascertained.Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|