Reportable based on analysis completed on (b)(6) 2015.It was reported that crossing difficulties were encountered.The non totally occluded, eccentric, de novo target lesion was located in the mildly calcified carotid artery.After a 205cm non bsc guidewire crossed the lesion, the physician stented the distal carotis interna with a 7x50 carotid wallstent.The physician needed a second stent to covert the bifurcation and the distal carotis communis.A 8.0-29 carotid wallstent¿ was advanced to treat the lesion but there was resistance and failed to cross the previously placed stent.The physician saw that the stent did not cover the distal 1mm with the delivery sheath.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and patient's status was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed stent damage.
|
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device was received for analysis.A visual and microscopic examination confirmed that the distal stent wires were uncrossed.This damage is consistent with the device encountering an obstruction during the advancement of the device.There were no issues noted with the profile of the tip.The tip od was measured and is within specification.The stent was partially deployed by 4mm.No issues were noted with the balloon profile.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped, evenly folded and the balloon was not subjected to positive pressure.A visual and tactile examination found no kinks or damage along the shaft of the device.The delivery system od was measured and is within specification.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
|