• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/16/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the duodenum during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the brush was stuck in the ampulla and it would not advance into the duct over the wire due to blunt tip.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be okay.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) difficulty advancing into the duct.Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual evaluation of the returned device revealed that the catheter working length was bent and twisted in multiple places throughout.The catheter tip was undamaged, its lumen openings and distal edge were in good condition.The brush was undamaged, properly formed and was fully extended and retracted without issue during functional evaluation.The bends and twists in the device and the difficulty in engaging the target vessel were most likely due to some aspects of tortuous anatomy or other operational factors of the procedure.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification is "operational context." a review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no other complaints exist for the specified lot.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the duodenum during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the brush was stuck in the ampulla and it would not advance into the duct over the wire due to blunt tip.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be okay.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4508425
MDR Text Key5529850
Report Number3005099803-2015-00304
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/09/2016
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number17269922
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/05/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/25/2015
Initial Date FDA Received02/11/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/11/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
-
-