|
Model Number 200432 |
Device Problem
Low Test Results (2458)
|
Patient Problems
Anemia (1706); Dyspnea (1816); Test Result (2695)
|
Event Date 12/17/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
"caller alleged discrepant results compared with the lab.Results as follows:" date, inratio, lab: (b)(6) 2014, 1.2, ---; (b)(6) 2014, ---, 5.2.Patient self tester's therapeutic range: 2.0-3.0.There was milking of the patient self tester's finger after the fingerstick; finger touched sample well when applying sample.Patient self tester (pst) was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2014 for shortness of breath; inr was 5.2 so pst's warfarin was held.Her son was not sure how long her warfarin dose was held but the usual dose of 4mg was resumed on (b)(6) 2014, the day after pst was discharged.Upon admittance to the hospital, pst was found to be anemic and was given blood to treat the anemia; she was discharged on (b)(6) 2014.No discharge diagnosis was available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation pending.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It is indicated that product is not returning for evaluation.Since the product associated with the complaint was not returned and retain strips for lot# 350587 were not available, a review of in-house testing was performed.Lot # 350588 was used for internal investigation purposes to evaluate the performance of the master lot.Lot# 350588 that is identical except for the outer packaging and labeling as lot# 350587.Retain strip testing results from lot# 350588 and 350587 met both accuracy and repeatability criteria.The products performed as expected and no product deficiencies were observed.The manufacturing records for lot# 350588 and 350587 were reviewed.The lots met specifications and no non-conformances were documented.Capa investigation (capa-(b)(4)) has determined that certain relevant conditions (e.G.Low hematocrit, sepsis) can contribute to discrepant inr results.The patient was reported to have anemia but a hematocrit was not provided.This capa has identified anemia as a condition that may contribute to a discrepant inr result.A notification letter has been sent to customers to inform them of these patient conditions.Since the meter was not returned, the impedance curve associated with the discrepant result could not be analyzed for characteristics of a weak-slope change.An impedance curve with a weak-slope change has been identified in capa-(b)(4) to contribute to a potential discrepant result.Root cause is unable to be determined at this time without product return.Further investigation is being performed under capa-(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Brand name changed from inratio pt/inr test strips to inratio 2 pt monitoring system.Model number changed to that of the inratio 2 pt monitoring system and serial number is included instead of strip lot number.Device is available for evaluation.Inratio pt/inr test strips listed instead of inratio monitor.The 510(k) listed is for the monitor rather than the strips.Device is evaluated by manufacturer and summary included.The monitor is not labeled for single use.Recall is indicated.Includes recall reporting number.The product associated with the complaint was returned for investigation.The complaint was not confirmed during in-house investigation.The customer reported a discrepant issue on lot# 350587.However, at the time of the investigation, retains for this lot were no longer available.As a result, lot # 350588 was used for internal investigation purposes to evaluate the performance of the master lot.Lot# 350588 is identical except for the outer packaging and labeling as lot# 350587.The returned meter met both accuracy and repeatability criteria and passed functional testing during an in-house investigation.The impedance curve analysis associated with this case found the curve exhibited a weak slope change.Our capa investigation (capa-(b)(4)) has determined that impedance curves with weak slope change can cause discrepant results.The capa investigation has also determined that certain patient conditions (e.G.Low hematocrit, sepsis) can contribute to weak slope change impedance curves.The patient is reported to be anemic at the time of the alleged discrepant result.Capa(b)(4) has identified anemia as a condition that may contribute to a discrepant inr result.A notification letter has been sent to customers to inform them of these patient conditions.A possible root cause is the patient condition anemia which may have contributed to an impedance curve that exhibited a weak-slope change.The inratio meter software may generate an incorrect or discrepant inr result when the patient sample exhibits a weak-slope change impedance curve.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|