(b)(6) (prospective clinical evaluation) on (b)(6) 2015, this patient presented to the emergency department with a three day history of fever and chills.She was febrile and had leukocytosis.Cxr (chest x-ray), ua (urine analysis) and influenza swab were all unremarkable.Blood culture was taken and she was given ceftriaxone.She was admitted to hospital on this date and repeat blood cultures were taken.She was started on vancomycin.The patient's catheter was removed on (b)(6) 2015 due to positive blood cultures/positive bacteremia, and a temporary catheter was placed.There were no complications with removal and the device was disposed.The catheter tip was not cultured.Blood cultures isolated (b)(6) on (b)(6) 2015.Repeat blood cultures were negative.A tunnelled femoral catheter was placed on (b)(6) 2015 and the patient was discharged home from hospital to continue with antibiotics in her outpatient clinic for 2 weeks and resume her usual dialysis schedule.As of (b)(6) 2015, the patient is doing well and has no fever.She is dialyzing with a right femoral catheter.
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation because the device has been disposed; therefore, an analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the manufacturing documentation confirms that the lot met the specification requirements.No deviations that could affect product quality were found.Taking into consideration, the evaluation conducted and the details of the complaint, this investigation was assigned the most probable root cause of an anticipated procedural complication.A complaint with a most probable root cause classification of an anticipated procedural complication indicates that a device related root cause does not apply and the complaint is due to a known effect of the procedure.
|