• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC XTRASOFT ORBIT GALAXY DETACHABLE COIL; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC XTRASOFT ORBIT GALAXY DETACHABLE COIL; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 640HX0204
Device Problem Difficult To Position (1467)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During coil embolization of an artery feeding a brain tumor, although the orbit galaxy (640hx0204/17046191) was delivered into the target lesion site, since the embolic coil did not properly loop properly to fill the target site, it was decided to recover the galaxy.However, while recovering the coil introducer, it became damaged 1cm from the distal end, and the galaxy could not be recovered for the re-use.Another galaxy of different size was used instead to continue the procedure, which was completed without further issues or delay.There were no patient injury/complications.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu) and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.No visible defect/damage was noted on the product prior to the event, and there was no embolic coil damage during the procedure.There was no unintended detachment of the coil observed in the vessel or in the mc.It was reported that the vessels were mildly tortuous, but not calcified.The complained product will be returned for analysis.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for analysis; however, the analysis has not yet been completed.Information regarding patient age, weight, medications, and concomitant devices were not provided.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint conclusion: during coil embolization of an artery feeding a brain tumor, although the orbit galaxy (640hx0204/17046191) was delivered into the target lesion site, since the embolic coil did not properly loop to fill the target site, it was decided to recover the galaxy.However, while recovering the coil introducer, it became damaged 1cm from the distal end, and the galaxy could not be recovered for the re-use.Another galaxy of different size was used instead to continue the procedure, which was completed without further issues or delay.There were no patient injury/complications.The complaint product was new and stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu) and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.No visible defect/damage was noted on the product prior to the event, and there was no embolic coil damage during the procedure.There was no unintended detachment of the coil observed in the vessel or in the microcatheter.It was reported that the vessels were mildly tortuous, but not calcified.The complaint product was returned for analysis.No further information is available.A non-sterile orbit galaxy helical xtrasoft coil was received coiled inside of a plastic bag.The hypotube was inspected and it was found without damage.The introducer was received un-zipped and it was found kinked.The support coil was received outside the introducer and it was found kinked.The gripper and embolic coil were received inside of introducer and without damages.The dispenser was received and no anomalies were noted in it.The support coil, gripper and embolic coil were inspected under microscope; the support coil was found kinked.The gripper and embolic coil were found without any damage.The functional test was performed.The orbit galaxy device could not be re-zipped due to the kink condition found on the introducer.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported complaint.The coil positioning difficulty could not be evaluated due to the nature of the complaint.The re-sheathing difficulty and coil introducer damage was confirmed during product analysis.The failure experienced by the customer appears to be due to the kink condition found in the introducer; however, this and the damages found on the device could not be conclusively determined.Neither the analysis nor the dhr suggest that the failure reported could be related to the manufacturing process.Additionally, inspections are in place that prevents these kinds of failures leaving from the manufacturing facility.Therefore, no corrective action will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XTRASOFT ORBIT GALAXY DETACHABLE COIL
Type of Device
ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
5088288310
MDR Report Key4567583
MDR Text Key5473914
Report Number3008264254-2015-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K093973
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/04/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number640HX0204
Device Lot Number17046191
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/06/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-