• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK RAPIDLOC (PLA/PDS) 2/0 PANACRYL 12° CURVE NEEDLE; MENISCAL IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK RAPIDLOC (PLA/PDS) 2/0 PANACRYL 12° CURVE NEEDLE; MENISCAL IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228311
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Surgical procedure, delayed (2565)
Event Date 02/11/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It broke when performing the shot and got away with the adjusting device.The surgeon don´t use any product to resolve this problem.He closed without suturing.Additional information from the affiliate did all three anchors break in this procedure? yes was the insertion off axis? no.Did the patient have hard bone? no.Please explain what the surgeon did to complete the procedure.The form states he closed with suturing, please explain.The doctor closed without suturing.Pending doctor explanation did this issue extend the procedure time greater than 30 minutes? yes.Associated medwatch 1221934-2015-00655, 1221934-2015-00656.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy mitek however it is not known if it will be received within the 30 day reporting requirement, therefore, depuy mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.In process.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint devices were received and evaluated.Visual observation of the applier reveals that the pusher rod was slight bent upward.This is possibly due to forced loading/unloading of the needle.When the trigger was operated, there was slight resistance noted but fully functional.It cannot be determined at what point the pusher rod was bent.This could have possibly cause misfiring and/or deployment issues.A definitive root cause cannot be determined at this point from the details provided.Three needles were received and only one pds top hat was received for one device and the top hat was missing for the other two devices.Moreover, it was observed that top hat was received unloaded off the needle.There are shifting/ bunching of the silicon tubing part of all three needles.The distal end of the silicon tubing of one of the needles was severely damaged, indicating hitting a sharp/hard instrument during use.The deployment failure can be confirmed and may be attributed to mishandling of the devices.Other than this possibility we cannot discern a root cause for this failure.A batch record review has been conducted and our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any kind for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
It broke when performing the shot and got away with the adjusting device.The surgeon don't use any product to resolve this problem.He closed without suturing.Additional information from the affiliate did all three anchors break in this procedure? yes was the insertion off axis? no.Did the patient have hard bone? no.Please explain what the surgeon did to complete the procedure.The form states he closed with suturing, please explain.The doctor closed without suturing.Pending doctor explanation.Did this issue extend the procedure time greater than 30 minutes? yes.Associated medwatched 1221934-2015-00655, 1221934-2015-00656.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAPIDLOC (PLA/PDS) 2/0 PANACRYL 12° CURVE NEEDLE
Type of Device
MENISCAL IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
bahaa nashed
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key4586735
MDR Text Key5448963
Report Number1221934-2015-00654
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePE
PMA/PMN Number
K023388
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/10/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number228311
Device Lot Number3790056
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/26/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/11/2015
Device Age6 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/11/2015
Date Manufacturer Received02/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/05/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-