• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES(USA); PROTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES(USA); PROTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Failure to Osseointegrate (1863)
Patient Problems Tissue Damage (2104); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following article:veptr in non-ambulatory myelodysplasia patients.Flynn, r., et al (2007).J child orthop (2007)1: 255-276.The purpose of this report is to evaluate the patients with spina bifida and spinal deformity treated with the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) and included in the fda request for approval of humanitarian device exemption for the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib.The fda report includes 247 patients with surgeries performed by members of the chest wall deformity study group.Twenty patients were myelodysplastic none ambulatory.Data from remaining 16 patients with adequate follow up was extracted from the fda report and analyzed.The average age at the first surgery was 5 years; average follow up was 47.3 months.In nine patients the cobb angle was decreased an average of 14.4°; in five patients increased 12.6°.Thoracic spinal height was increased in twelve patients an average of 3.2 cm.And lost in two patients 0.8 cm.Twelve patients improved and two patients deteriorated ventilatory function.Implant lengthening was done on the average of every sixth months and device exchange every 30 months.Complications in five patients were due to the severity of the decreased pulmonary capacity.Implant failure and skin breakdown occurred in six patients.The rate of complications reported in this group of patients lies within the range reported for spinal fusion using standard approaches.The number of surgical procedures increases due to the need for expanding the implants as the child grows.The advantages of the veptr are: surgical incisions are away from the midline avoiding the midline scarred tissue and allowing growth of the spinal column with improved space available for the lung.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).This report is for unidentified patients for an unknown veptr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis veptr in non-ambulatory myelodysplasia patients.Flynn, r., et al (2007).J child orthop (2007)1: 255-276.This report is for an unknown veptr/unknown quantity/unknown lot.(b)(6).No patient codes available for worsening cobb angle, decreased thoracic spinal height, decreased pulmonary capacity, deteriorated ventilatory function the investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned and no lot number or part number were provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES(USA)
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4592224
MDR Text Key5466395
Report Number2520274-2015-11676
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
PH030009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/15/2015
Initial Date FDA Received03/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-