(b)(4).The associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection of the returned device noted signs of wear/use.The laser etching of the device is not readable.This indicates the insert may have been autoclaved.It should be noted that autoclaving of the insert will cause geometric changes in the device.The device was manufactured in 2008.A dimensional inspection was attempted; however damage/deformation at several features of the device would not allow for accurate measurement.A lab analysis was completed with the following results: damage/deformation and burnishing, could have been created by articulation with the femoral component, this was observed on the superior surface of the liner; some deformation may have been cause by third-body particulate (bone cement, bone, etc.).Damage/deformation was also observed near the periphery of the insert; these features may have been created by instrument contact during revision surgery.The insert may have been sterilized using an autoclave after explantation as no laser markings were visible; such autoclaving limits examination of uhmwpe devices.Features observed on the articular surface of the instrument were consistent with adhesive/abrasive wear and instrument damage.A definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This investigation could not verify or identify any evidence of product contribution to the reported problem.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.
|