• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the superior endplate of a prodisc-c implant has not had any sort of bony attachment on the c5 endplate and the keel cut in the c5 vertebral body is no longer clean- there appears to be a halo around the keel of the prodisc-c implant so it is not anchored very well.It was reported that the patient was implanted with a prodisc-c at c5-c6 on (b)(6) 2014.The surgeon reported that the patient did very well.The surgeon saw the patient in clinic on (b)(6) 2015 and the patient commented that it felt like her hands were twice their normal size, had arm pain, and some numbness in her right hand.The patient told the surgeon that she has had the symptoms for two months and they have progressively gotten worse.Based on the images taken in clinic on (b)(6) 2015, the surgeon commented that the superior endplate of the prodisc-c does not appear to have had any sort of bony attachment onto the c5 endplate.The surgeon also said that the keel cut in the c5 vertebral body is no longer clean and it appears that there is a halo around the keel of the prodisc-c implant so it is not anchored very well (view ap image).As a result the prodisc-c superior endplate seems to have moved anterior from its original position.The surgeon and the patient have discussed potentially removing the device and having an acdf at the c5-c6 level.No revision date is scheduled.X-ray images provided to synthes were reviewed by the synthes medical director on (b)(4) 2015.The review stated that the prodisc-c is implanted at c5/6 level.But by comparing several images taken on (b)(6) 2015 with one lateral image dated on (b)(6) 2014, it is difficult to confirm what was described in the complaint, such as ¿halo around the keel¿.The superior prodisc-c endplate seems moved anteriorly slightly.Cervical spine ct may be useful for further diagnosis.This report is for one unknown prodisc-c implant.This is report 1 of 1 (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.This report is for one unknown prodisc-c implant.Part and lot number were not provided by reporter.Udi is unknown.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4631405
MDR Text Key5615721
Report Number2530088-2015-10091
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PP070001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight55
-
-