• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 02/28/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the lead had broken.The healthcare provider (hcp) told the patient that the week prior and was recommending a revision.The patient was still having concerns with their device or therapy but was working with their hcp or manufacturer representative and they were still waiting for an appointment date.If additional information is received, a follow-up report will be sent.
 
Event Description
No stimulation sensation was reported.The patient fell in the snow a couple days ago, then he noticed two nights ago the implant appeared to shut off at night; so he turned it on but hasn¿t felt stimulation since that two nights ago.The patient was at the following settings: program one 3.60, program two 7.60, and program three 6.70.The patient increased program one first to 8.00, then entire group but still did not feel stimulation.An information request was made regarding the patient programmer (pp).Two days later it was reported the patient had a fall on sunday and then noticed on monday he lacked stimulation sensation.Impedances were checked today and found multiple instances of electrodes paired over 40,000 ohms; tested at 3v reference 0 all greater than 40 ,000 ohms, reference 1 some are at 1,100 with others out of regulation (oor), reference 8 all over 40,000 ohms.Group impedances, a1-3 are all over 40,000 ohms.Nine days later the patient still had concerns with his device or therapy but was working with his doctor or company representative.Ten days later the company representative confirmed the physician ordered an x-ray and there were no visible kinks or fractures noted.They were able to reprogram the lead and provide equivalent relief.There are three contacts working.They were able to check the connection of the leads at the battery, and that also appeared okay.The patient was encouraged to talk with his insurance company to see if they covered a lead revision or replacement.The patient is receiving adequate stimulation at this time.Additional information has been requested.If additional information is received, a follow up report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 97754, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger; product id 97740, serial# (b)(4), product type: programmer, patient; product id 977a160, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead; product id 977a160, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead; product id 977a160, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead; product id 977a160, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type: lead.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the patient fell and since then stimulation wasn't working.As a result the patient experienced less than 50% therapy relief and decreased stimulation in the back and leg with intermittent jolting.High impedances of greater than 10,000 on all electrodes except #2 were reported.The patient was feeling intermittent stimulation and it wasn't helping the pain.It was noted there was a break/fracture of the lead/extension, however, an x-ray verified the leads were still in place and there was no obvious fracture/break.The physician was going to schedule the patient for dual lead replacement but the date was to be determined.At the time of the report the issue was not resolved.At the time of the report the patient was alive with no injury.No outcome was reported regarding this event.Further follow-up is being conducted to obtain this information.If additional information is received, a follow-up report will be sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4632665
MDR Text Key5737260
Report Number3004209178-2015-05399
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2014
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/01/2015
Date Device Manufactured09/19/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00052 YR
-
-