• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS TINA-QUANT HEMOGLOBIN A1C GEN.2; ASSAY, GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS TINA-QUANT HEMOGLOBIN A1C GEN.2; ASSAY, GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04528123190
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/25/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer questioned results for patient samples tested for tina- quant hemoglobin a1cdx gen.2 hemolysate application - standardized according to ifcc transferable to dcct/ngsp (a1cx2).The total number of patients affected could not be provided.The customer estimated that approximately 50-100 patients were involved.Of the data provided for 21 patient samples, all 21 were found to be erroneous.The customer realized while running the tests that the patient results were not feasible and ran quality controls on the cassette (reagent lot 693374-01).The customer indicated the control results were too high on this cassette.The customer removed this cassette from the device and inserted a new cassette with the same lot number.The customer calibrated the instrument, ran quality controls and repeated the patient samples.The patient results from the 2nd cassette (reagent lot 693374- 01) were considered to be correct.The patient results from the 1st cassette had been reported outside of the laboratory.The physicians were contacted and informed of the incorrect results within 24 hours.The incorrect results had no impact on patient therapy and no adverse event occurred.Patient sample 1 initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 10.4%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 6.4%.Patient sample 2 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.2%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.8%.Patient sample 3 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 9.1%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 6.2%.Patient sample 4 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.3%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.4%.Patient sample 5 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 12.0%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 8.6%.Patient sample 6 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.6%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 6.2%.Patient sample 7 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 9.7%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 6.7%.Patient sample 8 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 10.0%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 7.0%.Patient sample 9 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 12.7%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 8.7%.Patient sample 10 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.1%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.2%.Patient sample 11 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.7%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.7%.Patient sample 12 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 7.4%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.1%.Patient sample 13 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 12.1%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 8.4%.Patient sample 14 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 9.2%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.8%.Patient sample 15 ((b)(6)year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 9.0%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.7%.Patient sample 16 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 8.2%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.3%.Patient sample 17 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 10.1%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.7%.Patient sample 18 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 10.2%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.8%.Patient sample 19 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 11.4%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.6%.Patient sample 20 ((b)(6) year old male) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 15.6%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 10.3%.Patient sample 21 ((b)(6) year old female) initial a1cx2 result from the 1st cassette was 10.3%.The repeat result from the 2nd cassette was 5.8%.The cobas integra 800 analyzer serial number was (b)(4).The most recent service date for the analyzer was (b)(6) 2015.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During the investigation, a retention cassette of the same lot that the customer used was calibrated and controls were run.Controls were also run on the customer's cassette without new calibration.Control recovery with the retention cassette was within specification.Control recovery with the customer's cassette was out of specification.The customer's cassette was calibrated and controls were run again.Control recovery was now within specification.The calibration with the customer's cassette showed lower signals in comparison to the retention cassette.A visual examination of the reagent showed a yellow coloring of r2 in the customer's cassette.The retention reagent was without color.A specific root cause could not be identified.The root cause of the discrepant results was most likely the discoloring of r2 on the customer's reagent, however, the cause of this is unknown.The damage to the customer's cassette might be due to incorrect storage at the customer site or the damage could have occurred during transport.There is no indication that this issue is due to a systemic problem with the roche product as other complaints of this nature have been received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TINA-QUANT HEMOGLOBIN A1C GEN.2
Type of Device
ASSAY, GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 6830 5
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key4679667
MDR Text Key5625092
Report Number1823260-2015-02886
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LCP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
K072714
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04528123190
Device Lot Number693374-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Laboratory
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/10/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age059 YR
-
-