• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) PERCUFLEX? URINARY DIVERSION STENT; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) PERCUFLEX? URINARY DIVERSION STENT; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061603250
Device Problem Kinked (1339)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/13/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex¿ urinary diversion stent was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, there was no issue during implantation, and the stent had been implanted in the patient for two days.Reportedly, during withdrawal, the pig tail section was found kinked.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patients¿ condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to report the device lot number; therefore the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.However, the complainant stated that the device was used prior to the expiration date.(b)(4) stent kinked.Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A visual analysis of the device found the stent pigtail was kink.A functional evaluation was performed and found that the mandrel that was inserted was able to pass through the stent without resistance.The evaluation concluded that the most probable root cause for this event is related to the procedural factors found during the procedure that most likely limited the integrity of the device.It is possible that the kink in the stent could have been generated from the manipulation of the device during the procedure.Therefore, the most probable cause is considered operational context.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex¿ urinary diversion stent was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, there was no issue during implantation, and the stent had been implanted in the patient for two days.Reportedly, during withdrawal, the pig tail section was found kinked.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patients¿ condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCUFLEX? URINARY DIVERSION STENT
Type of Device
CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4686113
MDR Text Key5714530
Report Number3005099803-2015-01050
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K830803
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/13/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM0061603250
Device Catalogue Number160-325
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/23/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/07/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-