• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CRYOLIFE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number HERO 1001
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Stenosis (2263)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the journal article, hero- the last resort measure- single center series and review of literature, a (b)(6) patient who had been on dialysis for 2 years received a hero graft on (b)(6) 2014 due to bilateral central vein occlusion.The patient has had 3 previous surgeries and a bmi of 53.The hero was placed in the left internal jugular vein.The hero graft migraft to the superior vena cava (svc).An attempt to advance the hero to the right atrium failed due to severe fibrotic central vein stenosis.The hero was removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the journal article, hero- the last measure - single center series and review of literature, a (b)(6) patient who had been on dialysis for 2 years received a hero graft on (b)(6) 2014 due to bilateral central vein occlusion.The patient has had 3 previous surgeries and a bmi of (b)(6).The hero was placed in the left internal jugular vein.The hero graft migrated to the superior vena cava (svc).An attempt to advance the hero to the right atrium failed due to severe fibrotic central vein stenosis.The hero was removed.This patient is also discussed in the case study, catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute superior vena cava syndrome caused by central venous catheters.The case study gives additional information of the patient's co-morbidities along with access history.The patient followed up in a clinic 10 days after receiving the hero device and reported a pounding headache, dizziness, palpitation, and facial swelling.Chest x-ray showed that the tip of the hero graft was against wall of the svc.A clinical diagnosis of acute superior vena cava syndrome (svcs) was made and the patient was admitted.The hero graft was removed the next day.Possible lot numbers were identified and reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record device migration is listed on the hero graft instructions for use (ifu) as a potential vascular graft and catheter complication.Directions on how to place the device are provided in the ifu.Without operative notes or further details about device placement it is not clear how this event occurred and if there were any surgical deviations from the specified methodology.Superior vena cava (svc) syndrome is listed as a potential vascular graft and catheter complication on the ifu.The symptoms reported on the clinic presentation, including headache, dizziness, palpitation, and facial swelling, are known symptoms of superior vena cava (svc) syndrome.The attempt to advance the device into the right atrium was an appropriate course of action to salvage the device and regain access.After failure to access the right atrium, the decision to explant was appropriate given the patient history of access challenges.Superior vena cava syndrome and device migration are known potential complications which are outlined in the device's ifu.There is no evidence to suggest that an error occurred in processing or production.There is no indication that an error or deficiency occurred at cryolife and the ifu adequately communicates risk.
 
Event Description
According to the journal article, hero- the last resort measure- single center series and review of literature, a (b)(6) patient who had been on dialysis for 2 years received a hero graft on (b)(6) 2014 due to bilateral central vein occlusion.The patient has had 3 previous surgeries and a bmi of (b)(6).The hero was placed in the left internal jugular vein.The hero graft migraft to the superior vena cava (svc).An attempt to advance the hero to the right atrium failed due to severe fibrotic central vein stenosis.The hero was removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HERO GRAFT
Type of Device
VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer (Section G)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
sandra o'reilly
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key4690732
MDR Text Key5651134
Report Number1063481-2015-00043
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K124039
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberHERO 1001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/06/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age28 YR
-
-