It was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2015 that a customer had an issue with a dialysis catheter.The customer reports that the catheter became damaged on (b)(6) 2015.Shortly after the start of the hemodialysis treatment, presence of air was observed in the tubing of the arterial side circuit.Treatment was put on hold to verify catheter.A crack was observed in the venous side of the catheter as cvc flow inverted at the beginning of treatment.Device pathways were clamped, catheter was removed and doctor was advised.Implantation date: (b)(6) 2012.Removal of the catheter (b)(6) 2015.After consultation with nurses who did the treatment for that patient mentioned that nothing was wrong up until the date of the incident.They used another device without further consequence.The patient underwent an installation of a central venous catheter tunneled right internal jugular vein.
|
The device history record was reviewed indicating that product was released accomplishing all quality standard requirements.There were no non-conforming issues reported during the production of this product for a similar condition as reported in this complaint.The complaint sample was not returned to the manufacturing site for review.Without the sample, it is not possible to determine a confirmed root cause of this issue.Should the sample be returned in the future, this complaint will be re-opened for further investigation.A corrective action is not warranted at this time.It must be noted that in-process controls (such as personnel training, incoming quality acceptance testing for raw material, 100% in process visual inspection and visual acceptance sampling) are in place to prevent non-conforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.As per procedure, manufacturing performs 100% leak testing at the final stage of production, which would identify this issue in the catheter assembly.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
|