• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX15 W/ 3L RESERVIOR (RT. PORT); BLOOD GAS OXYGENATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX15 W/ 3L RESERVIOR (RT. PORT); BLOOD GAS OXYGENATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CX*RX15RE30
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/26/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The user facility reported breakage on the yellow caps of the rx15 device.Follow up communication with the user facility reported the following information: (1) the perfusionist removed the oxygenator from the box; (2) it was noticed that the yellow luer lock caps to the arterial sample blood localized over the reservoir were fractured; and (3) the procedure was completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion code - (68) other; device sustained shock during shipping and /or handling.The actual device was returned to the manufacturing facility and evaluation.Visual inspection upon receipt confirmed the customer's complaint.All of the yellow-caped side ports on the blue, red and yellow stop cocks had been fractured.Magnifying inspection of the fracture cross-sections on the sampling system found all the ports had been fractured at their bottoms, with the surfaces presenting the smooth state.Magnifying inspection of the fractured ports found all of them had the trace implying that the yellow caps had come into contact with an object.The fractured ports were fixed back to the sampling line system in place to see the location of the trace on the yellow caps.This revealed that the object had come into contact with the yellow caps from the above.Electron microscopic inspection of the fracture cross-sections on the sampling system found the whole surfaces were in the smooth state.A radial pattern was found to have been generated on the each fracture cross section, starting at one point located on the upper part of the fracture.This point the pattern started can be regarded as the point the generation of the fracture started.Subsequently, each starting point was examined at higher resolution.No embedded particle or no entrainment of air bubbles was confirmed.Visual inspection of the original unit box returned along with the actual sample found that one of the cushion materials had been deformed into a crushed shape.The framing cushion materials were removed for further inspection of the outer box.No significant damage was noted on it.From these findings, the deformity found on one of the cushion materials is likely to have been generated during the transportation back to japan.Reproductive testing was conducted.A current product sample was exposed to an instantaneous shock force on the yellow-caped ports on the sampling system from the above direction.The ports got fractured.Electron microscopic inspection of the fracture cross-sections revealed the state of their surfaces were very similar to that observed on the actual sample.A review of the dhr and the shipping inspection record of the involved product/lot# combination confirmed there were not any indications of production related problems or any discrepancies in the inspection result.A search of the complaint file found no previous report of this nature with the involved product /lot# combination.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.Although the exact cause cannot be determined based on the available information, the appearance of the involved sample is most consistent with the ports being subjected to a shock force during being unpacked by being hit against an object.The device labeling does address the potential for such an occurrence in the instruction for use (ifu) with the statement such as the following: "do not use if the package and/or device is damaged or if caps are not in place".All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending and follow up.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX RX15 W/ 3L RESERVIOR (RT. PORT)
Type of Device
BLOOD GAS OXYGENATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
cathleen hargreaves
950 elkton blvd.
elkton, MD 21921
8002837866
MDR Report Key4738909
MDR Text Key16460523
Report Number9681834-2015-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
PMA/PMN Number
K051997
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/10/2015,04/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberCX*RX15RE30
Device Lot Number140616
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/16/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/26/2015
Device Age10 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer04/10/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/10/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-