During the stent assisted coil embolization of an ophthalmic artery aneurysm, the deltapaq coil (b)(4) did not conform well to the aneurysm wall, and when repositioning, the surgeon noted the delivery wire herniated from the sheath and could not be resheathed.The device was then removed with the unspecified microcatheter.It was reported that the procedure was performed as per the instructions for use (ifu) and a continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.There was no premature detachment or damage to the actual coil.The surgeon changed to a new coil and microcatheter to complete the surgery.There was no report of patient injury or clinically significant delay in the procedure.The aneurysm was 3.3 x 4.05mm with a neck width of 2.6 mm.The device was not available to be returned.
|
Correction: it was initially reported that it was unknown if the device would be returned; however, the device was returned for analysis on 5/8/2015.Complaint conclusion: the device was returned for analysis.The coil was returned undamaged.The proximal pull tab section containing the locking mechanism has been severed and not returned.The resheathing tool has been separated off the sheath causing the core wires protrusion.The sheath has been severed and cut by an unidentified sharp straight edge tool of unknown origin.There is no mechanical sheath damage at the protrusion site.No manufacturing defects were found.Based on limited information and with the return of the undamaged coil, it cannot be determined why the coil did not conform to the aneurysm wall.Furthermore, it is important to note that it was unreported as to why the unidentified microcatheter was replaced after the complaint coil was removed from the patient.Concerning the resheathing difficulty, it was found that the severing of the sheaths pull tab containing the locking mechanism and ball tip allowed the resheathing tool to separate from the introducer sheath.This allowed the core wire to protrude outside the sheath.In this condition, resheathing the coil cannot be performed.The circumstances of how and when the sheath was severed and not returned cannot be determined.In addition, without the identification or the return of the unknown microcatheter and the severed proximal end of the sheath used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if these components had any contributions to the complaint event.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.The coil poor conformity to the aneurysm wall could not be confirmed during product analysis since the coils was returned undamaged.The sheath herniation was confirmed; however, the damage found on the sheath was related to post-procedural damage since it was reported that the sheath was not damaged during use.The root cause of the coil not confirming to the aneurysm and the sheath herniation could not be determined; however, procedural/handling factors may have contributed.There was no evidence of a manufacturing issue related to the event; therefore, no corrective/preventive actions will be taken at this time.
|