It was reported in a publication that the authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 57 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent posterior occipitocervical, cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine fusions with rhbmp-2 from (b)(6) 2007, to (b)(6) 2011.The surgery consisted of routine exposure of the spine over the entire length to be instrumented.Placement of segmental instrumentation, if performed, was done in standard fashion.Decortication of the laminae, spinous processes, and facet joints was performed using a matchstick bur after placement of spinal instrumentation.Increments of kits of rhbmp-2 were used in each case and applied on a collagen sponge.The collagen sponges were generally cut into 1-cm strips and placed in a single layer overlying the posterior elements after thorough decortication of the bone.The amount of rhbmp-2 was determined intraoperatively, depending on the surface area of the intended fusion levels.For the purposes of this study, patients and caretaker(s) were brought back to the clinic off schedule for assessment of the development of cancer, or were questioned via telephone follow-up by a clinical neurosurgery nurse.There were no new cases of cancer, or degeneration or metastasis of existing malignancies in this series.Case 1.Female, age 14 yrs, 2 months.Patient presented with a history of lipoblastomatosis, epidural lipomatosis, progressive myelopathy, and spastic paraparesis.Patient underwent decompressive laminectomies at t7-l3 and arthrodesis.36 mg of bmp2, local autograft, and morselized cancellous allograft were used.Post-op, the patient developed sterile seroma, and heterotopic bone formation secondary to bmp with restenosis of spinal canal necessitating reoperation.
|
Article citation: sayama et al.Routine use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein¿2 in posterior fusions of the pediatric spine and incidence of cancer.J neurosurg pediatr.2015 apr 10:1-10.Implant: (b)(6) 2007 to (b)(6) 2011.(b)(4).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.Products from multiple manufacturers were implanted during the procedure.Although it is unknown if any of the devices contributed to the reported event, we are filing this mdr for notification purposes.
|