• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENTS (NIM)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENTS (NIM) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PC0840RXC
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/12/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The report received from the affiliate indicated that during a carotid case, the 8x40mm precise pro rx product was deployed successfully in the patient.When the precise stent delivery system was being retrieved, and pulled through the 6fr sheath, it was a little difficult to remove and pull through the sheath.After some manipulation of the pin, the catheter was removed safely from the patient.The sds was ultimately removed through the sheath.There was no patient injury reported.The product will be returned for analysis.The temperature exposure indicator on the pouch was checked to confirm that the black dotted pattern with a grey background was clearly visible.The product was stored in the hospital, inside the interventional radiology unit.The product was stored, inspected, handled, and prepped according to the instructions for use.There was nothing unusual noted about stent delivery system prior to use.The target lesion was located in the internal carotid artery.The physician stented from the common carotid artery to the internal carotid artery.The diameter was a little over 7mm.The target lesion vessel length was a little over 30mm.The rate of stenosis is unknown.The degree of calcification is unknown.The vessel was not tortuous.A 6f cook shuttle sheath was used.A guiding catheter was not used.The diameter of the unconstrained stent was sized 1-2mm larger than the vessel diameter.The stent delivery system did not have to pass through any acute bends.There was no difficulty advancing/tracking the sds towards the lesion.There was no thrombus present proximal to, at, or distal to the lesion site.There was no difficulty or resistance noted while crossing the lesion with the stent.The sds did not have to pass through a previously placed stent.The stent was delivered safely to the lesion and expanded fully with good wall apposition.It is unknown if the device was prepped in the tray; ¿they might of removed the stent from the packaging¿.The tuohy borst valve was in the open position when received.Following the ifu, the outer sheath was advanced until the outer sheath marker contacted the catheter tip, and the system was withdrawn as one unit.According to the physician "i believe the most pertinent thing to remember here is that the company recommends advancing the sheath back when there is resistance on the withdrawal which is what i ended up doing.I'm curious to know what is catching when you do not do this because you usually don't have to in my experience.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This device is available for analysis but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.The gender of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint conclusion.The site reported that after deploying an 8 x 40mm precise pro rx, the stent delivery system (sds) was difficult to pull out through the 6f non-cordis sheath.The sds was removed from the sheath with some manipulation and with no reported patient injury.The event involved a patient undergoing a percutaneous intervention of the internal carotid artery and was described as having a diameter of ¿a little over 7mm¿, with a length of ¿a little over 30mm¿ and non-tortuous.The site reported that the device had been stored within the radiology department and had been inspected and handled according to the instructions for use (ifu).In addition, the temperature exposure indicator on the pouch had been checked to confirm that the black dotted pattern with a grey background was clearly visible.They further reported that there was nothing unusual about the device prior to use.During the intervention, a 6f non-cordis sheath was used without a guide catheter.The diameter of the unconstrained stent was 1-2mm larger than the vessel diameter.No thrombus was noted proximal to, at or distal to the target lesion.The hemostatic valve of the device was in the open position when received.The sds did not have to pass through any acute bends and no difficulty was experienced while advancing/ tracking it to the lesion.The sds did not have to pass through a previously deployed stent and no difficulty or resistance was experienced while crossing the lesion with the sds.The physician deployed the stent in a vessel segment that extended from the common carotid artery to the internal carotid artery with full expansion and good wall apposition.When the physician withdrew the sds, some resistance was noted when pulling through the non-cordis sheath.The physician reported that when resistance was met during withdrawal, he advanced the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacted the catheter tip and then withdrew the sds as instructed in the ifu.The device was removed with some manipulation and with no reported patient injury.One non sterile unit of precise pro rx us carotid syst was received coiled inside a plastic bag.The device was received without stent.No anomalies or damages were observed on the received unit.The involved sheath introducer was not received.The outer diameter (od) of the outer shaft was measured and it was found within dimensional specifications.Functional analysis was performed with the use of a lab sample 5f sheath introducer and no resistance was experienced during the insertion/withdrawal.A review of the manufacturing records for this lot of products revealed that it met specification prior to release.The reported "sds - withdrawal difficulty" event was not confirmed since the od was found within specification and the device passed functional testing.Based on the limited information available for review, it is not possible to determine what factors may have contributed to the reported issue.According to the product ifu, the use of the precise pro rx device is contraindicated in patient in whom the guide catheter is unable to be placed.According to the product ifu, users are instructed to advance the outer sheath until the outer sheath marker contacts the catheter tip and then withdraw the system without the guidewire when any resistance is met during the withdrawal of the device.Neither the dhr review nor the product analysis suggests that the failure is related to the manufacturing process.Therefore, no actions will be taken.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING STENTS (NIM)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL
Manufacturer Contact
cecil navajas
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
7863133880
MDR Report Key4791926
MDR Text Key5858269
Report Number9616099-2015-00213
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/23/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2016
Device Catalogue NumberPC0840RXC
Device Lot Number17116937
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/21/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
6F SHEATH
-
-