• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EX062003CL
Device Problems Break (1069); Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/29/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that during placement of the vascular stent in the sfa, the stent could not be deployed any further after being partially released.During the attempt to complete the deployment manually.A part of the stent broke off and remained in the pt.The delivery system with the undeployed part of the stent could be retracted without issue.Another stent was implanted inside the remaining portion of the fractured stent to fix it against the vessel wall.No pt injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records are being reviewed.The event is currently under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot history records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.There is no indication for a manufacturing-related failure.The evaluation of the returned device confirmed the partial release and fracture of the stent.Increased friction is considered the reason for increased release force and subsequent deployment failure.The image provided confirmed that the fractured part of the stent was covered with an additional stent.Potential factors that could have led or contributed to the reported event have been evaluated.Previous investigations of similar complaints have been reviewed.The reported event may be related to difficult anatomical conditions as tortuous or calcified vessels may lead to increased friction.The use of a guide wire smaller than recommended in the ifu (0.014 inch instead of 0.035 inch) also may be a contributing factor.The event also may be use-related as rough handling of the device can lead to friction increase.Based on the information available, a definite root cause could not be determined.The ifu states: "do not constrict the delivery system during stent deployment.If excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system and replace with a new unit." furthermore, the ifu recommends the use of a 0.035 inch guide wire.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
karlsruhe
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
daniela mueller
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
2194450
MDR Report Key4794673
MDR Text Key16179177
Report Number9681442-2015-00048
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P070014/S047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/30/2016
Device Catalogue NumberEX062003CL
Device Lot NumberANYJ3361
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/19/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/30/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/21/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
-
-