On (b)(6) 2015, a cervical esi procedure (t1-t2) was being performed with a brevi-kath and rk needle.During removal, the catheter sheared leaving a portion of both the catheter's coating and spring (approximately 4 cm) housed within the patient.The product in question was discarded.
|
On 05/01/2015, epimed's (b)(4) received an email from a patient who was involved in a procedure where a piece of the brevi-kath catheter had sheared off within her upon removal.The patient stated within her email to epimed that the remaining piece of catheter will have to be surgically removed.The patient was initially seeking a reimbursement for the sheared brevi-kath catheter.This request was considered unusual; therefore it was further investigated by epimed's qa manager.During the investigation epimed was informed by dr.(b)(6) (patient's physician) that the patient had been involved in a procedure he performed where approximately 4 cm of both the coating and the internally wound spring had sheared off and was left housed within the patient.Epimed has since reached out to the physician who performed the procedure seeking additional information.However, the physician does not feel comfortable answering the questions requested of him.The physician stated that he is awaiting direction and guidance from his administration on how to proceed.Epimed has confidence that if the ifu pi-004 rev.4 (spring guide epidural catheter product) was adhered to, damage to the catheter could have been prevented.
|