• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS U.K. LTD. UNKNOWN KNEE; PROTHESIS, KNEE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS U.K. LTD. UNKNOWN KNEE; PROTHESIS, KNEE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Damage to Ligament(s) (1952)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Information was received based on review of a journal article titled, "the mid-term outcomes of the oxford domed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement" which aimed to assess the survival and clinical outcomes of the domed oxford unicompartimental knee replacement in a large patient cohort in the medium term using the oxford unicompartimental knee revision, manufactured at biomet.This study consisted of 265 consecutive knees in 258 patients that underwent partial knee arthroplasty between september 2004 and july 2012 due to isolated disease of the lateral compartment.A total of 13 knees had re-operations, of which four were for dislocation.All dislocations occurred in the first two years.Another, two re-operations were secondary to significant trauma that resulted in ruptured ligaments, and two were spontaneous.In 4 patients, the unicompartimental knee replacement was converted to a primary total knee replacement.At final follow-up, the implant survival at 8 years, with failure defined as any revision, was 92.1%.Specifically, for this designer study the dislocation rate was less then 1% at the eight year mark.In conclusion, the dome lateral oxford unicompartimental knee replacement using the oxford partial knee system manufactured at biomet, gives good clinical outcomes, low re-operation rates, revision rates, and dislocation rates in patients with isolated lateral compartmental disease.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit conclusions as to the cause of the events.Event details and product identification was not provided for the patients mentioned in the journal article.The following sections could not be completed with the limited information provided.Date of event - unknown expiration date - unknown date implanted - unknown date explanted - unknown initial reporter - the article was written by j.S weston-simons in the bone and joint journal (2014): 96-b:59-64.Manufacture date ¿ unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay corrected event description.
 
Event Description
Information was received based on review of a journal article titled, "the mid-term outcomes of the oxford domed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement" which aimed to assess the survival and clinical outcomes of the domed oxford unicompartimental knee replacement in a large patient cohort in the medium term using the oxford unicompartimental knee revision, manufactured at biomet.This study consisted of 265 consecutive knees in 258 patients that underwent partial knee arthroplastys between september 2004 and july 2012 due to isolated disease of the lateral compartment.A total of 12 knees had re-operations, of which four were for dislocation.All dislocations occurred in the first two years.Another, two re-operations were secondary to significant trauma that resulted in ruptured ligaments, and two were spontaneous.In 4 patients, the unicompartimental knee replacement was converted to a primary total knee replacement.At final follow-up, the implant survival at 8 years, with failure defined as any revision, was 92.1%.Specifically, for this designer study the dislocation rate was less then 1% at the eight year mark.In conclusion, the dome lateral oxford unicompartimental knee replacement using the oxford partial knee system manufactured at biomet, gives good clinical outcomes, low re-operation rates, revision rates, and dislocation rates in patients with isolated lateral compartmental disease.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN KNEE
Type of Device
PROTHESIS, KNEE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS U.K. LTD.
waterton industrial estate
bridgend, south wales CF31 3XA
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key4799923
MDR Text Key16545330
Report Number0001825034-2015-02228
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PUNKNOWN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/27/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/06/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-