• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) PENTARAY NAV ECO HIGH-DENSITY MAPPING CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRACARDIAC MAPPING, HIGH-DENSITY ARRAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) PENTARAY NAV ECO HIGH-DENSITY MAPPING CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRACARDIAC MAPPING, HIGH-DENSITY ARRAY Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1282-11-S
Device Problems Bent (1059); Folded (2630); Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a pentaray navigational eco catheter and the bwi failure analysis lab noted the returned catheter condition that the ring was lifted and sharp.It was originally reported that the pentaray navigational eco catheter spines were bent.The catheter was replaced and the procedure was continued.The procedure was completed with no patient consequence.Upon request additional information was provided.The bend prolapsed a spine.The spine was folded back on itself and was not useful.No exposed wires.There was no difficulty in removing the catheter.This event was assessed as not reportable as the potential that it could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or other significant adverse event, was remote.The bwi failure analysis received the catheter and noted the returned catheter condition on april 30, 2015.The spine cover c was pulled away from the pu center of the nitinol flower and was bent down about 4mm from the proximal side of ring #12 and bent again about 2mm from the proximal end of ring #10.Ring #11 was lifted up and sharp on the distal side.Additional information was provided on the returned catheter condition.The 8.5 fr sl1 sheath was used.The spine cover pulled away from the pu center of the nitinol flower was assessed as not reportable as there was there was no exposure of internal components or any evidence that the integrity of the catheter had been compromised and the spines were fully attached.This event is being reported because the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation and found ring #11 was lifted up and sharp on the distal side.The awareness date for this record was (b)(6) 2015.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a pentaray navigational eco catheter.The pentaray navigational eco catheter spines were bent.The catheter was replaced and the procedure was continued.The procedure was completed with no patient consequence.Upon receipt, the catheter was visually inspected and it was found that the spine cover c was pulled away from the polyurethane (pu) center of the nitinol flower and was bent down about 4mm from the proximal side of ring # 12 and bent again about 2mm from proximal end of ring #10.Ring #11 was lifted up and sharp on the distal side.During analysis it was found that there were signs of the pu in the spine cover bent, so the spine cover was initially adhered.Due to the ring damaged, a scanning electron microscope (sem) analysis was performed and results showed that the proximal electrode ring material presented clear evidence of scratched and abrasion marks.The distal electrode ring presented deformations bumps and scratches marks.Probably this deformation found on the distal electrode ring was induced due to a stuck event and after that the ring lifted up as observed.It is very likely that the unknown object which caused the mechanical damage on the proximal electrode ring could cause the damages and lifted up condition found on the distal electrode ring.No other issues were found.Outside diameters were measured and it was found within specifications.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, dhr review verifies that device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint has been confirmed.However, it is unknown how the damage occurred on the spine cover c and the rings.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENTARAY NAV ECO HIGH-DENSITY MAPPING CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRACARDIAC MAPPING, HIGH-DENSITY ARRAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
shahe garabedian
9098397362
MDR Report Key4806274
MDR Text Key5916566
Report Number9673241-2015-00333
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MTD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K123837
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/29/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2017
Device Model NumberD-1282-11-S
Device Catalogue NumberD128211
Device Lot Number17085405L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/30/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/06/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-