• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEICA BIOSYSTEMS RICHMOND, INC. ARIOL SL-200 SCANNING SYSTEM; NONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEICA BIOSYSTEMS RICHMOND, INC. ARIOL SL-200 SCANNING SYSTEM; NONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Not Applicable (3189)
Event Date 04/30/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Customer reported the following issues with the ariol sl-200 scanning system: persistent inconsistencies in frame illumination (changes in color and brightness) in the same scan.Inconsistency in the count number of target events.Variability in overall brightness between different scans.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is still under investigation.Follow up report will be sent upon receipt of additional information.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARIOL SL-200 SCANNING SYSTEM
Type of Device
NONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEICA BIOSYSTEMS RICHMOND, INC.
richmond
Manufacturer Contact
joseph consoli
5205 route 12
richmond, IL 60071
8156782000
MDR Report Key4810849
MDR Text Key5923933
Report Number1419341-2015-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K043519
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/01/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/18/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-