|
Catalog Number 72203299 |
Device Problem
Component Falling (1105)
|
Patient Problem
Head Injury (1879)
|
Event Date 05/08/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The spider2 loosened up in the middle of the procedure, dropped, and hit a nurse on the head.Customer said the battery was fine and fully charged.The nurse who was injured required medical attention at the reporting facility.The customer says they do 3-4 shoulder surgeries every week and use the spider for each one.They have had this unit approximately one year.The sales rep indicated he went into the account with a replacement spider device and was told by two staff members that the nurse who was injured had undergone a cat scan.Staff member stated there was no broken skin and as far as they were aware, no follow up treatment is scheduled at this time.Sales rep.Did not speak to the nurse himself as she had already left for the day.Additional information received indicates on the day of the incident ((b)(6) 2015), the nurse went home early and also the following monday on (b)(6) 2015, she left early as well.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Although anticipated, the device has not been received for analysis.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
One customer tenet spider2, patient limb positioner ((b)(4)), was received on (b)(6) 2015 and confirmed to be serial number (b)(4) as reported by the complaint.Product passed visual inspection with no physical damage to the unit observed.Complaint of sudden pressure loss could not be confirmed.The unit was functionally tested with pressurization cycles and long-term pressurization; however, the results of the testing determined the unit to be functionally acceptable.Both batteries accompanying the unit were confirmed to be functional and contained an adequate charge upon receiving.After disassembly of the device, a migration check was performed to assert that no oil loss or low levels of oil contributed to the reported complaint.Overall, no problems were found.No further investigation is warranted at this time.A review of the device history record was performed which confirmed no inconsistencies.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|