Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient initials are (b)(6).Patient weight was not provided by reporter.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
A product evaluation investigation was preformed: received 1 article of t-pal small, peek, sterile, height 10, part# 08.812.010 for manufacturing investigation.The wrench size 5.725mm of the t-pal implant is damaged.No ncrs were generated during production.During a visual inspection it was noticed that the area of the wrench size 5.725 is badly deformed.Therefore, the wrench size 5.725 cannot be measured anymore.These deformations only occur by applying high force on the t-pal implant, which is an indication of mishandling.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed, therefore review to the specific prm and prm line is not applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|