• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAH070502
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Premature Activation (1484); Difficult to Remove (1528); Sticking (1597); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 05/22/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2015, a gore viabahn endoprosthesis was being used in a chimney procedure with a cook evar device in the renal artery up into the aorta.The cook evar cuff was deployed first and then the gore viabahn endoprosthesis was being deployed.The access site for the viabahn device was in the arm.It was reported to gore that as the gore viabahn endoprosthesis was halfway deployed, the deployment line became stuck and broke.It was stated that the viabahn device moved out of the renal artery.As the physician was trying to snare the viabahn device, it fully deployed in the thoracic aorta.The gore viabahn endoprosthesis was removed from the femoral artery access site.The broken deployment line was still caught on a strut of the cook device.From the access point in the arm, a guiding catheter was used over the deployment line in an attempt to detach the line from the strut.As pressure was applied to the strut with the catheter, the deployment line broke again.This process was repeated a few times and the deployment line continued to break.The deployment line ended up being left inside the patient.The procedure was completed by using an atrium stent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing records for the device verified that the lot met all pre-release specifications.An explant analysis is currently being performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): the engineering evaluation stated that the following observations were made: the endoprosthesis and three segments of deployment line were returned to histology without the delivery catheter.The endoprosthesis was secured in the snare used to retrieve it and was unremarkable.The snare is not a gore product, and as such, was not evaluated.One segment of deployment line was tied to a multi-filament black thread of unknown origin.The deployment line fragments measured approximately 65cm, 19cm, and 7cm in length.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86001
Manufacturer Contact
sandra whicker
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key4838574
MDR Text Key16863911
Report Number2017233-2015-00352
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/24/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/06/2017
Device Catalogue NumberPAH070502
Device Lot Number13366038
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/10/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received06/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient Weight104
-
-