• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APPLIED MEDICAL **B3857, SILH ZEBRA XTRAFLO DEV 6FX26CM; FAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APPLIED MEDICAL **B3857, SILH ZEBRA XTRAFLO DEV 6FX26CM; FAD Back to Search Results
Model Number B3857
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/29/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Stent removal- "stent was in patient 9 months.During procedure to remove, stent came apart while the surgeon, dr.(b)(6) was trying to take it out." patient status: not known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The incident device anticipated to return.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.In accordance to 21 cfr 803.56, if we obtain additional information, which was not known or was not available when the initial report was submitted, then the supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
We have tried to obtain the incident device for evaluation with no success.It was verified on (b)(6) 2015 from our customer relation.The incident product was not returned for evaluation.In the absence of the subject device, it is difficult to determine the root cause of the incident.A review of the manufacturing records for this lot confirmed that the product passed all manufacturing and quality inspections.The root cause of the incident is unknown.Per the instructions for use (ifu), "if resistance is encountered during removal, fluoroscopically determine device position and cause of resistance." it is unclear if excessive force was used to remove the stent, which may cause the stent to break.Although the exact root cause of the incident could not be determined, applied medical will continue to monitor its vigilance system for trends and take appropriate actions as necessary.In accordance to 21 cfr 803.56, if we obtain additional information, which was not known or was not available when the initial report was submitted, then the supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from customer, october 08, 2015: an incomplete portion of the stent came out.Surgeon was able to remove the rest of the stent.The stent was broken into 2 different pieces.The stent was not able to be initially removed from the patient.The patient had to be taken into interventional radiology a week later where the removal was completed.No laser was used.Just grasping forceps.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
FAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
APPLIED MEDICAL
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita CA 92688
Manufacturer (Section G)
APPLIED MEDICAL
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita CA 92688
Manufacturer Contact
22872 avenida empresa
rancho santa margarita, CA 92688
9497138233
MDR Report Key4849296
MDR Text Key5937783
Report Number2027111-2015-00381
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K040760
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2015,06/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date10/16/2016
Device Model NumberB3857
Device Catalogue Number100964609
Device Lot Number1207375
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/29/2015
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-