• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) CONTOUR?; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) CONTOUR?; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061802230
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/21/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a contour¿ ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure performed in the ureter on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stent pigtails would not curl when deployed in the kidney.The physician tried to manipulate it to get it to curl but it kept straight.Under x-ray, the stent was found linear in shape and when it was removed, it appeared relaxed.The procedure was completed with another contour stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event of "stent would curl." although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A visual analysis found no anomalies or damage to the device.Dimensional inspection of the stent's working length was performed and found that it is within specification.During functional analysis, a 0.038 mandrel was inserted and it passed properly without resistance; both coils formed without any problem when the guidewire was removed.The complaint that the stent did not curl was not confirmed.The device showed no evidence of either the alleged issue or any defect which could have contributed to the event.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a contour ureteral stent was used during a ureteroscopy procedure performed in the ureter on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stent pigtails would not curl when deployed in the kidney.The physician tried to manipulate it to get it to curl but it kept straight.Under x-ray, the stent was found linear in shape and when it was removed, it appeared relaxed.The procedure was completed with another contour stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTOUR?
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4849452
MDR Text Key5939992
Report Number3005099803-2015-01596
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K974541
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/27/2017
Device Model NumberM0061802230
Device Catalogue Number180-223
Device Lot Number17222529
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
-
-