It was reported the patient ((b)(6)) abruptly loss stimulation and experienced a sudden deterioration of mobility.Diagnostics revealed the patient's ipg was depleted.Additionally, it was noted by the physician that the patient's ipg depleted prematurely.Subsequently, the patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2015 and underwent surgical intervention on (b)(6) 2015 to explant and replace the ipg.Therapy was restored post-operative.
|
Evaluation: results: a visual inspection of the ipg did not reveal any discrepancies.Communication with the device as received was unsuccessful when using a patient programmer and wdl utility.With the device attached to an external supply, it was subjected to a functional test on automated test equipment (ate).This tester verifies the electrical performance of the control/communication circuitry, and output signal integrity.All portions of ate testing passed.Based on the available information, the estimated longevity was 35 months.The device provided 31 months of stimulation at the time of the observation, and had exceeded 88% of the estimated longevity, which is beyond the minimum requirement of 75%.Sjm has limited information related to the patient's medical history and is unable to form an opinion as to the relevancy of the patient's history to the event reported.Sjm defers to the patient's physician regarding medical history.
|