|
Catalog Number 497.126 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Canada reported the following event: it was reported that x-rays taken on a follow-up visit on an unknown date in (b)(6) 2015, showed that the veptr to veptr ii adapter had shifted.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient was scheduled for fusion surgery (using expedium devices) as part of the patient¿s existing treatment plan.Preoperative x-rays taken on an unknown date prior to the (b)(6) 2015 surgery showed that the adapter had completely dislodged from the veptr construct.The post-operative x-rays (date unknown) showed that one small piece of metal from the veptr ii implant remained in that patient.The surgeon was not concerned, as it is the surgeon¿s opinion that it does not present any risk to the patient.It was also reported that two pangea screws have lost their polyaxial ability.The screws reportedly have fused in position and the tulip portion of the screws would no longer move.The patient¿s status following the revision surgery was not provided.This report is 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient information was not provided by the reporter.Date of event is unknown.Date of implant is unknown.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.A device history record review has also been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A product evaluation was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles indicates that: the veptr device is designed to mechanically stabilize and distract the thorax to correct three dimensional thoracic deformities and provide improvement in volume for respiration and lung growth in infantile and juvenile patients diagnosed with thoracic insufficiency syndrome.The veptr devices are attached perpendicular to the patient¿s natural ribs, or to the lumbar vertebra or ilium.The complaint description stated that a titanium veptr to veptr ii adapter had dislodged from a construct.The whole construct was returned, including one cradle end half (part number 497.126).Part 497.126 is a cradle end half that attaches to the superior or inferior cradle to encircle the superior or inferior rib.The drawing associated with the part (497_126 rev f) was reviewed.The drawing calls out the appropriate dimensions, material and finishing processes for a successful design.The veptr cradle end half, 497.126 / lot # 5283161, was returned intact.Instrumentation marks were observed on the part, which are consistent with damages that occur during removal of the implants.No design related issues were identified.There were no specific complaint allegations regarding the cradle end half.Furthermore, visual evaluation of the part did not reveal any abnormalities.A review of the design and clinical risk management document was therefore not performed.The complaint is unconfirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device history records was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing date 08dec2006.Part 497.126- lot # 5283161 and rm lot # 4957094 did not contain any ncrs or any anomalies.(b)(4).No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|