• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CADD SOLIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CADD SOLIS Back to Search Results
Device Problems Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional (1319); Programming Issue (3014)
Patient Problem Overdose (1988)
Event Type  Other  
Event Description
We have had errors with programming our pca pump which has resulted in pts receiving either a 5x (morphine) or 10x (hydromorphone) overdose (4 in the last 6 months).All of these cases involve a change from a standard (lower) concentration to a max (higher) concentration.In these cases, despite the nurse knowing that there is a change in the order, the pump was not been updated.In most of these cases, the error was found during a handoff between on-coming care providers.A contributing factor we've identified is the design layout of the pump programming screen.When programming the pump (cadd solis), the drug and concentration are picked together (i.E.Morphine at a concentration of 1 mg/ml is picked as morphine 1 mg/ml; the concentration is not picked separately).Once selected, the nurse is brought to a screen where the pca dose, continuous rate, 4 hour max dose, and lockout interval are input.The pump requires that the user confirm these settings before starting.In the cases we have seen, there usually is not a change in these parameters, only the concentration.Because everything else is the same, concentration is inadvertently omitted as a part of the independent double check.Additionally, the concentration display is on the far right side of the pump.When discussing these cases with staff involved, they frequently have commented that their focus is drawn to the dosing questions and not to the concentration.We feel the pump mfr can do a better job distinguishing the drug's concentration, perhaps including this as one of the items listed in the "clipboard" area on the programming screen.Finally, another contributing factor is that there is not a requirement to re-check your drug/concentration when a cassette is detached and a new one reattached.There are obvious advantages to this (not having to reprogram every time the cassette runs out), this negatively impacts changing to a new drug concentration.It is worth noting that our practices of independent double check have drifted from a truly independent check to more of a team based check.In discussions on why this is we have focused on our shift from a paper based check list, to an electronic one.The computers in the room are on the opposite side of the room from the pt's bed, making it difficult to independently verify the pump programming and the drug order.Some of our nurses have resorted to taking a picture of the pump and bringing it with them to the computer to compare.Please let me known any questions you may have.I think this has highlighted several important safety issues for use: human factors design of medication -related devices, implementation of risk reduction strategies (independent double checks) based on workspace layout coupled with transition to a fully electronic documentation system.(b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CADD SOLIS
Type of Device
CADD SOLIS
MDR Report Key4883806
MDR Text Key6265620
Report NumberMW5043388
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received06/25/2015
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-